According to Francois-Maurice Lepailleur, a convict living at the Hyde Park barracks in 1840, “You don’t starve but you’re always hungry.”
So what did convicts eat at Hyde Park barracks in the 1820s – 1840s when it was home to over 600 male convict workers at any one time?
Convict workers were entitled to basic food each week to a standard that was set by the government. Private landowners or businesses that employed convicts would have to provide their workers with a regular food allowance, and sometimes added little extras like tea and sugar as an incentive for good behaviour or working standards. Convicts employed by government for public works, like building roads, making bricks, carting supplies or unloading ships, were issued with food supplied from the government ‘ration’.
The convicts were allocated a weekly food allowance, or ‘ration’ which was set by the government. The ration components altered from time to time, but records show that the convicts living at the Hyde Park barracks generally received for one week :
7 pounds (3.1 kg) of flour
7 pounds (3.1 kg) meat*
3.5 pounds (1.6 kg) maize#
1/2 pound (225 g) of salt
1 pound (455 g) of sugar
1/4 pound (110 g) tea
In other words, each day they were given 450 g bread, 450 g meat, a cup of maize, a couple of tablespoons of salt, 1/4 cup of sugar, and 15 g tea, which, when compared to a 2 g tea bag today, would make almost 2 litres of tea!
*When the barrack’s fist opened the meat was salted – beef was cured, corned beef style, and pork, which was issued at a lesser rate of 4 pounds (1.8 kg) per week, was ‘dry’ cured, like bacon or pancetta.
#Maize is made from corn, which grew in abundance in the early colony and was very cheap. The convicts ground the corn on the dreaded treadmill to make it into cornmeal, a bit like polenta.
Food glorious food!
The barracks had its own bakery, where flour was baked into bread, and the meat was cooked into soupy stews with whatever vegetables available. The maize was made into ‘hominy’, a type of porridge or gruel for breakfast, with sugar and salt added to make it palatable.
The ration was supplemented with vegetables that were grown by the convicts in their kitchen garden. Depending how many vegetables they had, and if they had access to fresh milk, the ration provided enough kilo-joules or calories for a labouring man (almost 14,000 Kj), but may not have been nutritionally sound.
While official reports said that the food was ‘nutritive and not insufficient to dispel “the quirks and chotchets” of a moderate appetite‘ (Sydney Gazette, June 6, 1827) there were lots of complaints about the quality of the food.
George Cozens described the meals he was given when at the barracks in 1840:
‘With regard to the rations served out to so many men they consisted of hominy breakfast, a thick substance they say is made from maize meal, well boiled in water, which when cool, forms a substantial food, one pound of brown bread, and half a pound of animal food; this formed the daily allowance to each person, if I might except the liquor termed soup, in which the fresh meat is boiled, with a slight sprinkling of cabbage leaf.’
George Cozens, Adventures of a guardsman, 1848
Bread as heavy as lead
Another convict, Joseph Lindgard complained about the the bread that was given in 1837, saying it was ‘sour as a crab, as thodden as clay, and the very colour of a new born brick‘. Rations flour was of a coarse grade of flour which was cheaper than the fine white flour that wealthy people enjoyed. When wheat wasn’t in good supply, maize was used instead, giving the bread a gritty texture.
Despite their bread being darker coloured and heavy, it would actually have been more nutritious than the more refined white bread, but obviously it wasn’t very pleasant to eat. It was common for people to put their bread in their soup or stew if their bread was heavy or tough and stale. This would make the stew more satisfying to eat too.
Convicts were assigned to the kitchens each day to make sure the cooks didn’t cheat them by keeping a portion of the rations aside to sell for his own gain. According to the Superintendent’s Instructions from 1825:
‘He is to be particularly attentive to see that the provisions are properly cooked, that they are clean and wholesome, that a due proportion is allotted for each meal, and that no part of them is wasted, purloined, or improperly withheld by the cooks or other persons employed in their details’.
The convicts’ mess
The convicts were given two meals a day – breakfast at daybreak, before marching off to wherever they had to work, returning for dinner, which was taken in the middle of the day.
The convicts ate their meals in a large ‘mess hall’ which was built along the southern side of the barracks compound, opposite Hyde Park. Their food was cooked for them in central kitchens, and they didn’t get any choice about what they were given to eat. They ate in ‘mess groups’ of six men. One man would collect the food for their group, and then ladle it out to each man, so that everyone could see that they were getting their share.
Six pounds of fresh beef, boiled into soup, with a proportion of vegetable, and served up in a kid or small tub, six hungry men may manage to make a meal upon, with the addition of a slice of bread each, cut from the large loaf which garnishes each table’
The Sydney Gazette, June 6, 1827
If it wasn’t practical to return to the barracks, food was taken to the work-sites on carts. Convicts working beyond the town limits were ‘victualled’ by local suppliers who were contracted by the government.
Archaeological remains found during the building’s restoration in the 1980s revealed that the convicts diet wasn’t limited to the official food supply. Under the floors were oyster shells and peach, apricot and cherry stones.
Sources, Links and further reading
Instructions for the guidance of the superintendent and Subordinate Offices of the Establishment of Convicts in Hyde Park Barracks, Sydney 1825.
Francois-Maurice Lepailleur, Land of a thousand sorrows, The Australian Prison Journal 1840-1842, of the Exiled Canadien Patriote. translated and edited by F. Murray Greenwood. University of British Columbia Press, 1980.
Charles Cozens, Adventures of a guardsman. London : Richard Bentley, 1848.